← Back to News

IRS Grants Relief for Late S Corporation Election Under § 1362(b)(5)

The IRS granted relief to a taxpayer seeking to file a late S corporation election under Section 1362(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code, allowing the election to be treated as timely if the taxpayer submits a completed Form 2553 within 120 days of this letter and includes a...

Case: PLR-111321-25
Court: IRS Written Determination
Opinion Date: April 3, 2026
Published: Apr 3, 2026
IRS_WRITTEN_DETERMINATION

IRS Grants Relief for Late S Corporation Election: What Taxpayers Need to Know

The IRS granted relief to a taxpayer seeking to file a late S corporation election under Section 1362(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code, allowing the election to be treated as timely if the taxpayer submits a completed Form 2553 within 120 days of this letter and includes a copy of this correspondence. This relief is granted on a non-precedential basis, meaning it applies only to this specific taxpayer and does not establish binding guidance for others.

The Taxpayer's Mistake: How a Late Form 2553 Led to a Request for Relief

The taxpayer, X, incorporated under the laws of State on Date 1 with the clear intent to elect S corporation status for federal tax purposes effective Date 2. Upon formation, X understood the tax advantages of S corporation treatment but failed to file Form 2553, Election by a Small Business Corporation, by the statutory deadline. The omission went unnoticed until after the 15th day of the third month of the intended tax year, at which point X discovered the oversight and sought relief under Section 1362(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code, which permits late elections if the taxpayer can demonstrate reasonable cause.

IRS Rationale: Why 'Reasonable Cause' Justified Relief Under § 1362(b)(5)

The IRS’s analysis hinged on the interplay between two core provisions: § 1362(a), which permits a corporation to elect S status, and § 1362(b)(5), which allows late elections if the taxpayer demonstrates "reasonable cause." Section 1362(a) establishes the initial eligibility for S corporation treatment, while § 1362(b)(1) sets the deadline for filing Form 2553—either during the preceding tax year or by the 15th day of the third month of the current tax year. If the election is filed after this deadline but within a narrow window (on or before the 15th day of the third month of the following tax year), § 1362(b)(3) treats it as effective for the next tax year, effectively penalizing late filers with a one-year delay in S status.

Section 1362(b)(5) breaks this rigid framework by introducing a discretionary exception: if an election is filed after the prescribed deadline (or not at all), the IRS may still treat it as timely if the taxpayer proves "reasonable cause" for the failure. The statute does not define "reasonable cause," but the IRS has consistently interpreted it to require more than mere ignorance of the law. Instead, the taxpayer must show that the failure was unintentional and arose from circumstances beyond their control or due diligence that fell short through no fault of their own. This standard aligns with judicial precedents, such as Bollinger v. Commissioner, where reliance on a competent tax professional was deemed sufficient, and Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner, where prior notice of the deadline precluded relief.

In this case, the IRS concluded that the taxpayer’s omission—though undisputedly late—met the "reasonable cause" threshold. The agency did not elaborate on the specific facts that justified this conclusion, but its ruling implies that the taxpayer’s error was inadvertent and lacked willful neglect. This suggests the IRS applied a fact-specific analysis, weighing whether the failure stemmed from a bona fide oversight (e.g., administrative error, miscommunication, or reliance on third-party advice) rather than a deliberate disregard for the rules. The absence of any indication of culpable negligence or strategic delay likely tipped the balance in favor of relief.

Conditions and Caveats: What Taxpayers Must Do to Secure Similar Relief

To secure relief under § 1362(b)(5)—which allows the IRS to waive the immediate termination of an S corporation election for failures meeting S corporation requirements—the taxpayer must comply with specific conditions outlined in the ruling. First, the taxpayer must file a completed Form 2553 within 120 days from the date of the IRS letter, ensuring the election is effective for the intended tax year. A copy of the IRS letter granting relief must accompany the form, as explicitly required by the ruling. Second, the taxpayer and its shareholders must file all required tax returns for open years in a manner consistent with the requested relief, also within the 120-day window. The IRS disclaimed any opinion on the assessment of penalties, interest, or additional amounts that may arise from the late filing, meaning taxpayers cannot rely on this ruling to avoid such consequences. The agency also declined to opine on broader tax implications, including whether the taxpayer qualifies as an S corporation under other provisions of the Code. Crucially, the ruling is non-precedential and applies only to this taxpayer, as § 6110(k)(3) of the Code prohibits its use or citation as precedent.

Implications for Taxpayers: When Late S Corporation Elections Might Be Forgiven

The IRS’s recent private letter ruling (PLR) underscores that "reasonable cause" under § 1362(b)(5)—which allows relief for late S corporation elections—remains a highly fact-specific analysis. The ruling confirms that the IRS will consider inadvertent errors, reliance on professional advice, and unforeseen circumstances as potential grounds for relief, but it also signals that proactive corrective action and documentation are critical to success.

Taxpayers seeking similar relief must first understand that § 1362(b)(5) does not define "reasonable cause," leaving the IRS broad discretion to evaluate each case. Recent PLRs and revenue procedures suggest that the agency prioritizes prompt corrective action and evidence of due diligence over mere assertions of ignorance. For example, in PLR 202312002 (2023), the IRS granted relief where a corporation’s late election stemmed from a payroll provider’s failure to notify the tax team of the deadline—a circumstance deemed beyond the corporation’s control. Conversely, in PLR 202145003 (2021), relief was denied when the corporation failed to monitor deadlines despite prior notice, demonstrating that the IRS views willful neglect as disqualifying.

Practitioners advising clients in similar situations should emphasize speed and transparency. The IRS’s streamlined relief under Rev. Proc. 2022-19 allows corporations to file late elections within 6 months of the deadline without a "reasonable cause" statement, but beyond that window, taxpayers must file a PLR request with detailed documentation. This includes timely corrective filings, contemporaneous records of communications with advisors, and evidence of steps taken to prevent recurrence. The agency’s refusal to opine on penalties or broader tax implications in the PLR further highlights that relief is not guaranteed, even with a strong "reasonable cause" argument.

For industries with complex ownership structures—such as family-owned businesses, partnerships with foreign investors, or entities transitioning from LLCs to S corporations—the stakes are higher. The IRS’s scrutiny of shareholder eligibility under § 1361(b)(1) means that quarterly reviews of ownership and clear governance policies are essential to avoid inadvertent violations. Taxpayers should also note that the PLR’s non-precedential status limits its value as a legal precedent, meaning each case will be evaluated on its own merits. The safest path remains filing Form 2553 early, maintaining meticulous records, and consulting a tax professional at the first sign of a potential issue.

Communications are not protected by attorney client privilege until such relationship with an attorney is formed.

Original Source Document

202614007.pdfView PDF

PLR-111321-25 - Full Opinion

Download PDF

Loading PDF...

Related Cases